Difference between revisions of "Nasal performance and benchmarks"

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎References: add pointers to related articles/efforts, some of these might actually be helpful for anyone working on this in the future)
m (→‎References: link to original Nasal regression tests (Andy Ross): https://github.com/andyross/nasal/tree/master/misc)
Line 17: Line 17:
== References ==
== References ==
=== Regression tests ===
* [https://github.com/andyross/nasal/tree/master/misc original regression tests (Andy Ross)]
=== Articles ===
=== Articles ===

Revision as of 17:08, 22 January 2019

This article is a stub. You can help the wiki by expanding it.

This article shall collect best practices for coding in Nasal based on regular performance tests.


Over the years many things have been improved so some old findings regarding performance are not true anymore. Regular benchmarking and updating should help the FlightGear community to have a clear picture of which code constructs perform well. Sometimes performance and "good" coding style (e.g. readability, re-usability, maintainability) might be in conflict.

Benchmark add-on

The benchmark add-on will be published here. It is basically a collection of nasal snippets to be tested.

Performance analysis


to be written



Regression tests


See also