Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
103 bytes added ,  20:53, 6 February 2019
m
Line 157: Line 157:  
'''''According to google, most pilots agree that the 182s is actually harder to fly than the 172p'''''  
 
'''''According to google, most pilots agree that the 182s is actually harder to fly than the 172p'''''  
   −
Not because of its flight characteristics. Though many pilot bends their firewalls on touchdown, due the nose heaviness of that aircraft.  But a lot pilot likes it more because of more power, more speed, higher possible altitudes, constant speed propeller and the IFR-equipement. And that`s the reason - due to that it is much more challenging than the Cessna 172. Imagine beeing in a crowded area like KLAX, approaching the airportwhile listening to Radio calls every few seconds, watching speed, altitude, VOR-needles and the traffic around at the same time in bad weather condition - challenging!
+
Not because of its flight characteristics. Though many pilot bends their firewalls on touchdown, due the nose heaviness of that aircraft.  But a lot pilot likes it more because of more power, more speed, higher possible altitudes, constant speed propeller and the IFR-equipement. And that`s the reason - due to that it is much more challenging than the Cessna 172. So FAA counts the Cessna 182 to the high perfomace aircraft. Imagine beeing in a crowded area like KLAX, approaching the airportwhile listening to Radio calls every few seconds, watching speed, altitude, manage the engine and prop speed, chasing VOR-needles and the traffic around at the same time in bad weather condition - challenging!
 
You might wanna read this: [https://pilotbrian.blogspot.com/2009/05/stepping-up-to-c182.html Stepping Up to a C182 ]
 
You might wanna read this: [https://pilotbrian.blogspot.com/2009/05/stepping-up-to-c182.html Stepping Up to a C182 ]
  
866

edits

Navigation menu