8,574
edits
User talk:Gijs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→06/2014 newsletter: too much of a mess
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
::::: Hey, good job - that looks indeed much better. I was wondering if we should slightly extend the template, and then simply port [[Instant-cquotes]] to optionally create tailored sections for the newsletter, i.e. without the cquote, and using galleries, what do you think ?--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 20:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | ::::: Hey, good job - that looks indeed much better. I was wondering if we should slightly extend the template, and then simply port [[Instant-cquotes]] to optionally create tailored sections for the newsletter, i.e. without the cquote, and using galleries, what do you think ?--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 20:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::: With the new section titles (that come with an author field), we don't need those quotes to make clear who's saying stuff. I've changed them to running texts now, which is a lot nicer to read IMO. Doing that on the first run is a lot easier than doing it later on, as I had to dig up the posts, get acquainted with the subject etc. The script you're using adds quite some nasty HTML to the wiki (treating normal urls as wiki links, adding dozens of <nowiki><br/></nowiki>, ignoring bullet lists), so I would suggest to not use it on large scale for now. If you can change it to produce running texts with correct wiki markup it would be a whole lot better ;-) | |||
:::::: I'll have a look if we can re-enable sectional edits. Removing that was definitely unintended. My intention was to make the newsletter a little more appealing and less of an ordinary wiki article. | |||
:::::: [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] ([[User talk:Gijs|talk]]) 20:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | |||