Supported Video Cards: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Support for Unix-like operating systems: -undone previous edits, such considerations have no place here, since this page is about how good the user experience is in FG while using a given card-driver combination
(→‎Support for Unix-like operating systems: -undone previous edits, such considerations have no place here, since this page is about how good the user experience is in FG while using a given card-driver combination)
Line 15: Line 15:
== Support for Unix-like operating systems ==
== Support for Unix-like operating systems ==


If you are using FlightGear with a Unix-like operating system (i.e. Linux, BSD, Solaris, SGI, etc.), check for the latest video driver that fully supports your graphics card or integrated GPU. In general, Nvidia video driver support used to be considered better than ATI and Intel support. However, this refers to the proprietary binary "blobs", which entail a few (potentially serious) issues regarding freedom and long term driver maintenance (and, therefore, card support).
If you are using FlightGear with a Unix-like operating system (i.e. Linux, BSD, Solaris, SGI, etc.), check for the latest video driver that fully supports your graphics card or integrated GPU. In general, from a user experience point of view,  nVidia's video driver support is considered better than ATI and Intel support.  
 
Given the fact that there are alternate "proprietary" vs "free" implementations, please mention the one you are using when adding cards to the list below.
For instance, Nvidia is known to refuse to disclose the hardware specifications needed to write a graphics driver, providing a closed binary only. Therefore, the free nouveau driver cannot support 3D acceleration, which is not good if you want to run FlightGear.
 
On the other hand, AMD now publishes hardware specifications (though not complete) and the resulting free radeon driver for ATI/AMD chipsets provides a good 3D support for many cards, even recent ones (obviously not for the newest), so it is worth to try. An excellent source to see which card families and features are supported by this driver, can be found on the Xorg Foundation website. [http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature]
 
For example, FlightGear 2.10 runs smoothly with an ATI Radeon X1950 card, using the free radeon driver version 6.14.4 (the only issue being a locally strange rendering behavior if landscape rendering is enabled).
 
'''If you experienced good results running FlightGear with a free graphics driver, please add them here with a few details.'''


== Graphic Cards recommended for FlightGear 2.10+ ==
== Graphic Cards recommended for FlightGear 2.10+ ==
422

edits

Navigation menu