Aircraft rating system: Difference between revisions

Aircraft rating system (view source)

3 bytes removed , 8 December 2007

m

2,561

edits

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 === Desired Results ===
-It can be expected that following this or similarly factually objective approaches to classifying aircraft development status, should not only help people understanding more easily and more completely an individual aircraft's development status, but also highlight the strengths and weaknesses of an aircraft, so that aircraft authors are motivated because of the work they have actually done, rather than being discouraged because of the work they could not (yet) do (or might possibly never be able to do because of it being outside their usual scope of contributions).
+It can be expected that following this or similarly factually objective approaches to classifying aircraft development status, should not only help people understand more easily and more completely an individual aircraft's development status, but also highlight the strengths and weaknesses of an aircraft, so that aircraft authors are motivated because of the work they have actually done, rather than being discouraged because of the work they could not (yet) do (or might possibly never be able to do because of it being outside their usual scope of contributions).
 Additionally, this would also help aircraft becoming more self-documented, so that new contributors could more easily see where and how their help could be used.