2,561
edits
Aircraft rating system: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Scope
m (→Intro) |
m (→Scope) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This page is dedicated to providing a place to start collecting suggestions about how to describe aircraft development status more formally and reliably, to point out the strengths and weaknesses of individual aircraft implementations more comprehensively. | This page is dedicated to providing a place to start collecting suggestions about how to describe aircraft development status more formally and reliably, to point out the strengths and weaknesses of individual aircraft implementations more comprehensively. | ||
Given that people seem to be expecting different things when they read about an aircraft's development status being "alpha", "beta" or "production", it should be possible to address this issue, by starting to classify each aircraft's individual components (i.e. fdm, cockpit panel, 3d model etc) directly, rather than the overall aircraft itself. | Given that people seem to be expecting different things when they read about an aircraft's development status being "alpha", "beta" or "production", it should be possible to address this issue, by starting to classify each aircraft's individual components (i.e. fdm, cockpit panel, 3d model etc) directly, rather than the overall aircraft itself which would result in less-developed parts of an aircraft (which can usually be assumed to be most of it) affecting an aircraft's development status negatively, even if it should feature some very well-developed parts. | ||
=== Suggestions === | === Suggestions === | ||