399
edits
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I am pretty sure what really flying implementation of really flying spacecraft opens new horizons for FlightGear right now, instead of fictional craft implementation what can not go anywhere at all yet. | I am pretty sure what really flying implementation of really flying spacecraft opens new horizons for FlightGear right now, instead of fictional craft implementation what can not go anywhere at all yet. | ||
By the way, to go somewhere in reality You need only to make thing what goes. To go somewhere in simulation You need to make place where to go, too. For sure right now Dr. Who in FlightGear can not move in time and space as he did in fiction, because that places not implemented in FlightGear yet. And to make that places is more complex task than implement other planets where spacecraft can go. So planets will be implemented first. So for now spacecraft is more important. | By the way, to go somewhere in reality You need only to make thing what goes. To go somewhere in simulation You need to make place where to go, too. For sure right now Dr. Who in FlightGear can not move in time and space as he did in fiction, because that places not implemented in FlightGear yet. And to make that places is more complex task than to implement other planets where spacecraft can go. So planets will be implemented first. So for now spacecraft is more important. | ||
But I feel what moving some other man article down is an insult to him, even if You are right and there is more important things than what he did wrote. So I had put "Vostok-1" "aircraft" up instead of moving "Dr. Who TARDIS" "aircraft" down. | But I feel what moving some other man article down is an insult to him, even if You are right and there is more important things than what he did wrote. So I had put "Vostok-1" "aircraft" up instead of moving "Dr. Who TARDIS" "aircraft" down. | ||
edits