The Property tree and HLA

This article is a stub. You can help the wiki by expanding it.

In terms of integration with the property tree, I'm thinking that in the short term all the different components that we split out into separate threads or executables will simply use their own properties trees, and use the RTI to reflect the particular (minimal) data that needs to be passed between components. — Stuart Buchanan (Nov 19th, 2015). Re: [Flightgear-devel] HLA developments. (powered by Instant-Cquotes)

The second thing is to realise that the property tree as it is currently is in need of some rework because of the ownship (single desktop aircraft) approach. This is easier than it sounds - basically most of the property tree becomes part of the aircraft and only a few items are shared. This will also allow the switching of aircraft. The reason to consider this now, and maybe not implement it, is to ensure that the design will support this when it is time to implement it. — Richard Harrison (Nov 19th, 2015). Re: [Flightgear-devel] HLA developments. (powered by Instant-Cquotes)