2,733
edits
Template talk:Repo link: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Todo list: Reply + add note
(→Todo list: Horribly late reply) |
Red Leader (talk | contribs) (→Todo list: Reply + add note) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Todo list == | == Todo list == | ||
{{note|These proposals are out of date. See subsequent discussion instead.}} | |||
A list to record changes to repository link templates. Feel free to contribute. | A list to record changes to repository link templates. Feel free to contribute. | ||
| Line 201: | Line 202: | ||
::: —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 17:34, 10 September 2015 (EDT) | ::: —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 17:34, 10 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::: Personally, I would prefer all-lowercase, abbreviated links. Camel-case repo names doesn't look quite right in the context to me. However, I agree with everything else you've said. I think that having a central template ({{tl|repo link}}) is not required now. If ever the location of fgdata, FGAddon, etc. changes again, it still wouldn't be too hard to change the location in a handful of templates instead of one central template. Separate templates would also be much simpler than a central one and therefore easier to maintain. | |||
:::: So, apart from link styling, I think we can start implementing these new templates: | |||
::::* {{obr}}'''flightgear file'''{{cbr}} | |||
::::* {{obr}}'''simgear file'''{{cbr}} | |||
::::* {{obr}}'''fgdata file'''{{cbr}} | |||
::::* {{obr}}'''fgaddon aircraft'''{{cbr}} (right name?) | |||
:::: Regards, | |||
:::: [[User:Red_Leader|<span style="color:red">'''''Red Leader'''''</span>]] ([[User_talk:Red_Leader|Talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Red_Leader|contribs]]) 08:45, 11 September 2015 (EDT) | |||