Talk:Building FlightGear - Cross Compiling: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:


i think i can prototype something right now for this, should i parallel with ({{Usr|FlyHigh}} -saiarcot895? what is his status right now? -- [[User:Hamzaalloush|Hamzaalloush]] ([[User talk:Hamzaalloush|talk]]) 16:35, 28 May 2015 (EDT)
i think i can prototype something right now for this, should i parallel with ({{Usr|FlyHigh}} -saiarcot895? what is his status right now? -- [[User:Hamzaalloush|Hamzaalloush]] ([[User talk:Hamzaalloush|talk]]) 16:35, 28 May 2015 (EDT)
: having a prototype (for SimGear headless) would make sense in my opinion, and it coud be used as a template for other (non-headless) stuff, including both, SG & FG as a whole, but also other dependencies (think openrti). So given that SimGear is the only common dependency here, I would suggest to prototype a well-commented example and get this committed, so that others can take a look and learn from it, e.g. to help refine SG/FG support and come up with modules for optional dependencies. The [[Superbuild]] would be a different beast anyway, because it is trying to do everything (including the source check outs), so that would require some thinking - and having experience with dedicated simgear.mk and flightgear.mk files should come in very handy for that.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 16:47, 28 May 2015 (EDT)


== .deb packaging ==
== .deb packaging ==

Navigation menu