13,241
edits
No edit summary |
(→PAF Team wiki Page: Community pages could be a good way to get more people interested, even more so if there is a language barrier) |
||
Line 442: | Line 442: | ||
Thank you for your opinion | Thank you for your opinion | ||
--[[User:Alexis|Alexis]] ([[User talk:Alexis|talk]]) 19:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC) | --[[User:Alexis|Alexis]] ([[User talk:Alexis|talk]]) 19:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
: I think it could be a good idea. Even more when considering that some FlightGear users might be more comfortable around people speaking their own language. There seem to be a few other communities, like for example ''FlightGear UK'' (FGUK) and ''Vive FG!'' that are rather unknown mony FlightGear users. The thing with the virtual airline pages is that there have been a lot of failed startups that leaves an unmaintained page with rotting links. | |||
: I do not think that these pages should be all to detailed, like for example listing ''all'' aircraft and their current development status or all events. That would just be another maintenance burden for someone from those communities. It probably would probably be a lot better to give overview and some highlights and link to the sites of those communities for the details (for example by linking to hangars and event subforums or websites). | |||
: Maybe it could be a good idea to mention on some aircraft pages that they mainly was developed in a certain community and link to that page. | |||
: What do you other think? | |||
: —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 21:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
[[Category:FlightGear wiki]] | [[Category:FlightGear wiki]] |