FlightGear wiki:Village pump: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎readability and quality of articles - quoting statements from the forum useful?: remove Freudian slip (for all hobby psychologists out there ...)
m (→‎readability and quality of articles - quoting statements from the forum useful?: remove Freudian slip (for all hobby psychologists out there ...))
Line 330: Line 330:
: As I previously said, on wikipedia (or even just the FlightGear forum), your language would have gotten your comments censored, and your account quite possibly banned temporarily - so whatever your intentions were, you were almost certainly contributing to the problem, not the solution.  
: As I previously said, on wikipedia (or even just the FlightGear forum), your language would have gotten your comments censored, and your account quite possibly banned temporarily - so whatever your intentions were, you were almost certainly contributing to the problem, not the solution.  


: Now, I didn't take any actions, because I am obviously not subjective, and because I don't normally get involved in moderating stuff - but whenever two parties (like i4dnf and myself) decide to escalate a discussion beyond a certain point, it is up to '''them''' to deal with the terms - you shouldn't just show up and get involved without also expecting to be treated accordingly, especially given your choice of language - no matter if your hobby/profession is psychology or not, the kind of name calling you started would have been absolutely inappropriate elsewhere, especially for someone who's trying to be authoritative about a discussion that he hasn't even be involved in at all.  
: Now, I didn't take any actions, because I am obviously not objective, and because I don't normally get involved in moderating stuff - but whenever two parties (like i4dnf and myself) decide to escalate a discussion beyond a certain point, it is up to '''them''' to deal with the terms - you shouldn't just show up and get involved without also expecting to be treated accordingly, especially given your choice of language - no matter if your hobby/profession is psychology or not, the kind of name calling you started would have been absolutely inappropriate elsewhere, especially for someone who's trying to be authoritative about a discussion that he hasn't even be involved in at all.  


: And exactly the same thing happened a couple of days ago on the P51d's talk page where you were trying to "moderate" things in a rather blunt fashion - in the meantime, I have been in touch with hvengel via PM and exchanged a number of PMs with concrete suggestions on potential '''Nasal''' related issues (that you seem to be entirely unaware of, but still feel qualified to comment on ...), so that I simply disregarded your edits and tone.  
: And exactly the same thing happened a couple of days ago on the P51d's talk page where you were trying to "moderate" things in a rather blunt fashion - in the meantime, I have been in touch with hvengel via PM and exchanged a number of PMs with concrete suggestions on potential '''Nasal''' related issues (that you seem to be entirely unaware of, but still feel qualified to comment on ...), so that I simply disregarded your edits and tone.  

Navigation menu