20,741
edits
FlightGear benchmark: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Background
(http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40325.html) |
m (→Background) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
{{cquote|I'm interested in the capability of doing multiple builds with different versions, branches and options and in doing some kind of automated testing on the resulting builds<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40416.html|title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG 2.12 RC Broken ?</nowiki>|author=Pat|date=Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:24:19 -0700}}</ref>|Pat}} | |||
{{cquote|Does flightgear have like a default benchmarking system? | {{cquote|Does flightgear have like a default benchmarking system? | ||
I think the devs should define a set of standard settings and perhaps a flight recording to benchmark flightgear on, to help determine a computer's suitability to run flightgear. Obviously user submitted benchmarkings are pretty different due to different software and settings, so a set of standards like the benchmarking in arma2/just cause2 etc. would be awesome. | I think the devs should define a set of standard settings and perhaps a flight recording to benchmark flightgear on, to help determine a computer's suitability to run flightgear. Obviously user submitted benchmarkings are pretty different due to different software and settings, so a set of standards like the benchmarking in arma2/just cause2 etc. would be awesome. | ||