20,741
edits
FlightGear benchmark: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40325.html
(http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40325.html) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* http://forums.xplanefreeware.net/topic/7993-benchmarking/ | * http://forums.xplanefreeware.net/topic/7993-benchmarking/ | ||
* http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=55153 | * http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=55153 | ||
== Status == | |||
{{cquote|While working on performance issues reported by cppcheck, I wanted to compare performance to a known baseline and came up with this simple test bench. | |||
It's: | |||
* written in Python | |||
* uses the telnet interface to FG | |||
* doesn't have other dependencies and | |||
* runs on Linux and Mac (tested) and run on Windows in its first incarnation | |||
The script is called framerate.py and it replays a pre-recorded flight (test2.out.gz described here: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Suggested_Prerecorded_Flights) while collecting numbers on frame rate and maximum latency. | |||
The repository for this is at : https://github.com/flighten/test<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40325.html|title=<nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix</nowiki>|author=Tom P|date=Sat, 22 Jun 2013 14:27:35 -0700}}</ref>|Tom P}} | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||