5,710
edits
Es/FlightGear Newsletter October 2011: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Es/FlightGear Newsletter October 2011 (view source)
Revision as of 04:22, 24 January 2013
, 24 January 2013→In the hangar
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
All the way back in May 2011, we addopted a new status-rating system for aircraft. So far, only a few have actually been rated, as can be seen in the list 'hockenberry' set up at [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApzphjA4w05ndF94Y2F0bzJTbHQ5QTJXZXJRcUVRbWc&hl=en_US Google Docs]. If you're an aircraft developer and your aircraft is/are not on the list, please consider rating their status. All you'll need to know/do is described at [[Formalizing Aircraft Status]]. If you'd just like to get started contributing to FlightGear, this would also seem like an excellent way to get started. | All the way back in May 2011, we addopted a new status-rating system for aircraft. So far, only a few have actually been rated, as can be seen in the list 'hockenberry' set up at [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApzphjA4w05ndF94Y2F0bzJTbHQ5QTJXZXJRcUVRbWc&hl=en_US Google Docs]. If you're an aircraft developer and your aircraft is/are not on the list, please consider rating their status. All you'll need to know/do is described at [[Formalizing Aircraft Status]]. If you'd just like to get started contributing to FlightGear, this would also seem like an excellent way to get started. | ||
== | == En el hangar == | ||
All the way back in May 2011, we addopted a new status-rating system for aircraft. So far, only a few have actually been rated, as can be seen in the list 'hockenberry' set up at [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApzphjA4w05ndF94Y2F0bzJTbHQ5QTJXZXJRcUVRbWc&hl=en_US Google Docs]. If you're an aircraft developer and your aircraft is/are not on the list, please consider rating their status. All you'll need to know/do is described at [[Formalizing Aircraft Status]]. If you'd just like to get started contributing to FlightGear, this would also seem like an excellent way to get started. | All the way back in May 2011, we addopted a new status-rating system for aircraft. So far, only a few have actually been rated, as can be seen in the list 'hockenberry' set up at [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApzphjA4w05ndF94Y2F0bzJTbHQ5QTJXZXJRcUVRbWc&hl=en_US Google Docs]. If you're an aircraft developer and your aircraft is/are not on the list, please consider rating their status. All you'll need to know/do is described at [[Formalizing Aircraft Status]]. If you'd just like to get started contributing to FlightGear, this would also seem like an excellent way to get started. | ||
=== | Durante todo el camino de vuelta en mayo de 2011, que addopted un nuevo sistema de clasificación por estado para los aviones. Hasta ahora, sólo unos pocos han sido realmente nominal, como se puede ver en 'Hockenberry' la lista elaborada en [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApzphjA4w05ndF94Y2F0bzJTbHQ5QTJXZXJRcUVRbWc&hl=en_US Docs Google]. Si eres un desarrollador de aeronave y es el avión / no están en la lista, por favor considerar la calificación de su estado. Todo lo que necesitas saber / hacer es descrito en [[La formalización de estado de la aeronave.]] Si lo que le gustaría empezar a contribuir FlightGear, esto también parece ser una excelente manera de empezar. | ||
=== Aeronaves actualizadas === | |||
The [[Learjet 35-A]] has been updated. Several minor errors have been fixed and improvements have been put in-place. The [[Learjet 35-A]] is a gem to fly and perfect for beginners and experts to try [[radio navigation]], autopilot control and [[ILS]] procedures. Thanks Xsaint and PH-JBO for the work done. | The [[Learjet 35-A]] has been updated. Several minor errors have been fixed and improvements have been put in-place. The [[Learjet 35-A]] is a gem to fly and perfect for beginners and experts to try [[radio navigation]], autopilot control and [[ILS]] procedures. Thanks Xsaint and PH-JBO for the work done. | ||
El [[Learjet 35-A]] ha sido actualizado. Varios pequeños errores han sido corregidos y mejoras se han puesto en el lugar. El [[Learjet 35-A]] es una joya para volar y perfecto para principiantes y expertos para tratar de [[radio navegación]], piloto automático y control de ILS [[]] procedimientos. Xsaint Gracias y PH JBO-por el trabajo realizado. | El [[Learjet 35-A]] ha sido actualizado. Varios pequeños errores han sido corregidos y mejoras se han puesto en el lugar. El [[Learjet 35-A]] es una joya para volar y perfecto para principiantes y expertos para tratar de [[radio navegación]], piloto automático y control de ILS [[]] procedimientos. Xsaint Gracias y PH JBO-por el trabajo realizado. | ||
=== | === La base de datos de libreas alcanza las 600 === | ||
On October 8, the [[FlightGear livery database]] welcomed its 600th livery! Thanks to 70 authors, the virtual skies are more colourful than ever. | On October 8, the [[FlightGear livery database]] welcomed its 600th livery! Thanks to 70 authors, the virtual skies are more colourful than ever. | ||
At the moment the contribution system is being rewritten. For the time being, new liveries are only accepted via direct email to [http://www.flightgear.org/forums/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=510 Gijs]. | At the moment the contribution system is being rewritten. For the time being, new liveries are only accepted via direct email to [http://www.flightgear.org/forums/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=510 Gijs]. | ||
El 8 de octubre, la [base de datos [librea FlightGear]] dio la bienvenida a su librea 600a! Gracias a 70 autores, los cielos virtuales son más coloridos que nunca. | El 8 de octubre, la [base de datos [librea FlightGear]] dio la bienvenida a su librea 600a! Gracias a 70 autores, los cielos virtuales son más coloridos que nunca. | ||