159
edits
Talk:Traffic alert and collision avoidance system: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Traffic alert and collision avoidance system (view source)
Revision as of 18:39, 9 October 2012
, 9 October 2012no edit summary
(instruments vs. displays) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
So, I am fully aware of the difference between instruments and displays - we just don't have a separate wxradar article at the moment... | So, I am fully aware of the difference between instruments and displays - we just don't have a separate wxradar article at the moment... | ||
--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] 14:15, 9 October 2012 (EDT) | --[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] 14:15, 9 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
I have invested lots of time to create the TCAS module. The wxradar extension to display traffic was a tiny part of the work. I wrote the wiki article since I hoped people would use the instrument. It doesn't really help if you keep sticking warning notices everywhere "''Most of the stuff here is deprecated''", basically voiding all the work and telling people not to use it - just because _you_ think that Nasal and Canvas is the one and only way ahead. Neither is it something motivating me to invest any more time into FG. When there is any other ready-to-use module available, which aircraft developers can immediately use to display TCAS traffic, then this page can well be extended. Until then, while there is no alternative available, I don't seen any reason to why people should be told to stop using it. So, I do *not* want the page to be changed with any such suggestions. | |||
-[[User:ThorstenB|ThorstenB]] 14:39, 9 October 2012 (EDT) | |||