How the FlightGear project works: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
So, we would like to ask you to keep these factor in mind when proposing changes and when voicing recommendations, and when discussing such issues with fellow community members, publicly or privately.
So, we would like to ask you to keep these factor in mind when proposing changes and when voicing recommendations, and when discussing such issues with fellow community members, publicly or privately.


= To be discussed =


* Influence in the Flightgear community scales roughly with level of your contributions.
* Influence in the Flightgear community scales roughly with level of your contributions.
* Obviously, long-time contributors have a more sizable track record of contributions which in turn gives their voice more weight
* Obviously, long-time contributors have a more sizable track record of contributions which in turn gives their voice more weight
* Things are done the way the majority of contributors thinks they are best, not necessarily by some general consensus.
* Things are done the way the majority of contributors thinks they are best, not necessarily by some general consensus.
*
* unnecessary community interactions are eating up time
* people able to build FlightGear from source, who know C++, who have some spare time to contribute to FG are in very short supply
* developers getting involved in lengthy discussions cannot write code at the same time

Navigation menu