20,741
edits
CompositeViewer support: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
too much fluctuation to point to any single commit/branch
(→Status) |
m (too much fluctuation to point to any single commit/branch) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|description = Support for multiple independent scene views | |description = Support for multiple independent scene views | ||
|status = experimental (building, mostly working in single-view mode, buildings missing, supports cloning independent views into distinct windows <ref>http://wiki.flightgear.org/CompositeViewer_Support#cite_note-22</ref>) <br/>{{Progressbar|30}} <ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37070203/</ref> | |status = experimental (building, mostly working in single-view mode, buildings missing, supports cloning independent views into distinct windows <ref>http://wiki.flightgear.org/CompositeViewer_Support#cite_note-22</ref>) <br/>{{Progressbar|30}} <ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37070203/</ref> | ||
|developers = Julian Smith<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37062319/</ref> | |developers = Julian Smith<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37062319/</ref> <ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37077854/</ref> | ||
|changelog = https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/profile/feed.rss | |changelog = https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/profile/feed.rss, https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/flightgear/ci/fc3a62e291fc5948811c43e1647905c9a50a726e/ | ||
<!-- | |||
|topic-fg= https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/flightgear/ci/CompositeViewer | |topic-fg= https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/flightgear/ci/CompositeViewer | ||
|topic-sg= https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/simgear/ci/CompositeViewer | |topic-sg= https://sourceforge.net/u/cgdae/simgear/ci/CompositeViewer | ||
--> | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
|folders = | |folders = | ||
| Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
== Status == | == Status == | ||
{{Note|While it's certainly possible to have a look at the changes and understand how things are working, the code isn't really ready for review and push yet - there's still loads of debug diagnostics and a few dead-ends in there. Jules is hoping to be able to address some of these over the next few days.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37077148/</ref> | {{Note|While it's certainly possible to have a look at the changes <ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37077854/</ref> and understand how things are working, the code isn't really ready for review and push yet - there's still loads of debug diagnostics and a few dead-ends in there. Jules is hoping to be able to address some of these over the next few days.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37077148/</ref> | ||
In other words: No one is claiming CompositeViewer support is anywhere near being ready to be enabled by default - there are lots of issues to sort out, at the moment chiefly how to get scenery to show up in cloned views and interact with scenery caching properly etc. | In other words: No one is claiming CompositeViewer support is anywhere near being ready to be enabled by default - there are lots of issues to sort out, at the moment chiefly how to get scenery to show up in cloned views and interact with scenery caching properly etc. | ||
Also, the potential benefits we get with an improved viewing system will be really significant. (For example easy creation at runtime of multiple arbitrary top-level | Also, the potential benefits we get with an improved viewing system will be really significant. (For example easy creation at runtime of multiple arbitrary top-level | ||