CompositeViewer support: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 54: Line 54:


== Status ==
== Status ==
{{Note|while it's certainly possible to have a look at the changes and understand how things are working, the code isn't really ready for review and push yet - there's still loads of debug diagnostics and a few dead-ends in there. Jules is hoping to be able to address some of these over the next few days.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/37077148/</ref>}}
In 07/2020, Julian Smith reported some  success by changing flightgear's FGRenderer's osgViewer::Viewer to an osgViewer::CompositeViewer with a single osgViewer::View, and patching up all the calling code so it compiles.
In 07/2020, Julian Smith reported some  success by changing flightgear's FGRenderer's osgViewer::Viewer to an osgViewer::CompositeViewer with a single osgViewer::View, and patching up all the calling code so it compiles.


It all builds ok, and he now got fgfs mostly working with CompositeViewer and the usual single View.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/flightgear-devel/</ref>
It all builds ok, and he now got fgfs mostly working with CompositeViewer and the usual single View.<ref>https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/flightgear-devel/</ref>


Julian made the use of CompositeViewer configurable at runtime, which might simplify getting involved in testing/further development - the same binary can now be used for normal use and for investigating CompositeViewer behaviour.
Julian made the use of CompositeViewer configurable at runtime, which might simplify getting involved in testing/further development - the same binary can now be used for normal use and for investigating CompositeViewer behaviour.

Navigation menu