13,282
edits
(Archived newsletters and dead links?) |
(→Archived newsletters and dead links?: I see no harm in updating rotten links in the newsletters) |
||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
[[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 04:52, 8 March 2016 (EST) | [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 04:52, 8 March 2016 (EST) | ||
: I think it could be a good idea to try update old links in those newsletters. I sometimes look back at things and tend to think that I probably are not the only one doing that. | |||
: I wonder if the rotten links should be replaced or stricken, but I think they could just as well be replaced. The key thing is that they go to the same resource or content, not weather they have been updated or not (also, the change will be visible in the revision history after all). | |||
: —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 07:11, 8 March 2016 (EST) | |||