Graphics card profiles: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
{{FGCquote
{{FGCquote
|1= This is something where it would make sense to provide a benchmark and test various combination of settings on different systems and gather all results in a central database to determine a safe subset of settings that should work for most AMD/ATI, NVIDIA and Intel boards - note that the CrashRpt tool is already gathering feedback on crashes and sending that to a webserver, where it is stored in a database.
|1= This is something where it would make sense to provide a benchmark and test various combination of settings on different systems and gather all results in a central database to determine a safe subset of settings that should work for most AMD/ATI, NVIDIA and Intel boards - note that the CrashRpt tool is already gathering feedback on crashes and sending that to a webserver, where it is stored in a database.
|2= {{cite web
  | url    = http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=275314#p275314
  | title  = <nowiki>Re: Review of FG on reddit: xpost</nowiki>
  | author = <nowiki>Hooray</nowiki>
  | date  = Feb 7th, 2016
  | added  = Feb 7th, 2016
  | script_version = 0.25
  }}
}}
{{FGCquote
|1= We could provide a --disable-gpu-profiles to resort to the old behavior, or require people to explicitly enable the new system via something like --enable-gpu-profiles, i.e. trying to pick an appropriate set of standard settings
The more difficult thing is fixing up subsystems that are not currently able to be reset/restarted with restarting FG as a whole
Note that the rendering settings dialog will already detect the INTEL substring and show a warning if appropriate
|2= {{cite web
|2= {{cite web
   | url    = http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=275314#p275314
   | url    = http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=275314#p275314

Navigation menu