FlightGear Qt launcher: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎PLIB/PUI (legacy GUI): http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34747786/
(→‎PLIB/PUI (legacy GUI): http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34747786/)
Line 199: Line 199:
   | author = <nowiki>Edward d'Auvergne</nowiki>
   | author = <nowiki>Edward d'Auvergne</nowiki>
   | date  = Oct 13th, 2015
   | date  = Oct 13th, 2015
  }}
}}
{{FGCquote
|1= At least for the time being, PUI  doesn't seem to become obsolete anytime soon, according to James Turner's continuing preference to hack/extend and maaintain custom PUI widgets:
http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34747786/
This observation is also in line with numerous PUI related commits that he made despite his ongoing Qt5 work: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Canvas_GUI#PUI_Widgets
For a more recent example, look at the waypointlist commits that are using neither Qt5, Phi or Canvas at all: http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/flightgear/ci/846fd2
|2= {{cite web
  | url    = http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=272148#p272148
  | title  = <nowiki>Re: Can't install FGRun package (+ rant about Qt5 launcher)</nowiki>
  | author = <nowiki>Hooray</nowiki>
  | date  = Jan 9th, 2016
  | added  = Jan 9th, 2016
  | script_version = 0.23
  }}
}}
{{FGCquote
|1= I am strongly against using a very non-standard UI (a text box + slider) to achieve that interaction. I’d much rather we add a spin-box to PUI, which is not especially hard, and give it the ‘click and drag’ mouse interaction which some spinboxes in other apps have, to give similar UI to the sliders without the visual clutter.
|2= {{cite web
  | url    = http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34747786/
  | title  = <nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] Speed-up vs time-warp</nowiki>
  | author = <nowiki>James Turner</nowiki>
  | date  = Jan 7th, 2016
  | added  = Jan 7th, 2016
  | script_version = 0.23
   }}
   }}
}}
}}

Navigation menu