FlightGear Qt launcher: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎PLIB/PUI (legacy GUI): http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34532040/
m (→‎PLIB/PUI (legacy GUI): http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34532040/)
Line 129: Line 129:


Except of course PUI will have to remain for some awkward use cases in the short term (aircraft dialogs, potentially). When compiled without Qt support, you’ll get a fully functional FG (i.e., '''Qt will never be a requirement to build FG'''), but without the GUI functions – which is indeed what some people want anyway (e.g., in some home cockpit setups).
Except of course PUI will have to remain for some awkward use cases in the short term (aircraft dialogs, potentially). When compiled without Qt support, you’ll get a fully functional FG (i.e., '''Qt will never be a requirement to build FG'''), but without the GUI functions – which is indeed what some people want anyway (e.g., in some home cockpit setups).
Any in-sim GUI using Qt will exist in parallel to the PLIB/PUI one for at least one major release, although this may mean maintaining two sets of dialogs, unless the XML-translation-tool is good enough that we can use it at run-time for aircraft dialogs<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34532040/</ref>.


Expect to see a test branch in Git in the next month or so, and hopefully something usable for 3.6. The PLIB code will remain so hopefully it can be a gradual transition<ref name="a">http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33245028/</ref>.
Expect to see a test branch in Git in the next month or so, and hopefully something usable for 3.6. The PLIB code will remain so hopefully it can be a gradual transition<ref name="a">http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33245028/</ref>.

Navigation menu