60
edits
Talk:Building FlightGear - Cross Compiling: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Building FlightGear - Cross Compiling (view source)
Revision as of 15:27, 30 May 2015
, 30 May 2015→Project Focus
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
: ok, I see - I was mainly referring to required OSG/SG and FG level patches to ensure that those are merged (think CMakeLists.txt stuff). Regarding mxe, I would suggest to gather all related patches/branches and establish this as a "fork" intended to support compilation of OSG-based applications like FlightGear, which would mean that other OSG projects/developers may sooner or later be interested in using such an "mxe.osg" fork. Equally, I would hope that using the OBS would help us do some more testing on non Ubuntu distros eventually (I am also on Ubuntu 14.xx) to ensure that "mxe.osg" works across a handful of main distros. For now, the focus should probably be coming up with an osgearth.mk module to see if the OSG integration is able to link other OSG apps, i.e. SG/FG afterwards. Once that is the case, we can review poweroftwo's batch file and create separate simgear-osgearth.mk and flightgear-osgearth.mk files for FG/osgEarth. The Superbuild shouldn't be a priority right now, but I will make sure to check what is required to get that working. Thanks so far everybody, great job !--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 09:00, 30 May 2015 (EDT) | : ok, I see - I was mainly referring to required OSG/SG and FG level patches to ensure that those are merged (think CMakeLists.txt stuff). Regarding mxe, I would suggest to gather all related patches/branches and establish this as a "fork" intended to support compilation of OSG-based applications like FlightGear, which would mean that other OSG projects/developers may sooner or later be interested in using such an "mxe.osg" fork. Equally, I would hope that using the OBS would help us do some more testing on non Ubuntu distros eventually (I am also on Ubuntu 14.xx) to ensure that "mxe.osg" works across a handful of main distros. For now, the focus should probably be coming up with an osgearth.mk module to see if the OSG integration is able to link other OSG apps, i.e. SG/FG afterwards. Once that is the case, we can review poweroftwo's batch file and create separate simgear-osgearth.mk and flightgear-osgearth.mk files for FG/osgEarth. The Superbuild shouldn't be a priority right now, but I will make sure to check what is required to get that working. Thanks so far everybody, great job !--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 09:00, 30 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:: Based on what I've seen, it probably will be possible to merge it into upstream (the commits might need some cleaning up), but the main blocker here is that the bug in GCC 5.1 that's blocking the compilation of OSG (or was it another library?) needs to be fixed. -- [[User:Flyhigh|Flyhigh]] ([[User talk:Flyhigh|talk]]) 11:27, 30 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
== .deb packaging == | == .deb packaging == | ||