FlightGear Qt launcher: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
m (as per source code headers)
No edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:
For the time being, Qt is only needed for the launcher feature, which is automatically disabled if it is not found<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33498614/</ref>.
For the time being, Qt is only needed for the launcher feature, which is automatically disabled if it is not found<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33498614/</ref>.
If CMake does not find QT5 then it skips the QT launcher compilation<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33498869/</ref>.
If CMake does not find QT5 then it skips the QT launcher compilation<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33498869/</ref>.
For now, the goal is to make an '''optional''' Qt dependency to replace PLIB PUI. Except of course PUI will have to remain for some awkward use cases in the short term (aircraft dialogs, potentially). When compiled without Qt support, you’ll get a fully functional FG (i.e., '''Qt will never be a requirement to build FG'''), but without the GUI functions – which is indeed what some people want anyway (e.g., in some home cockpit setups).


== Canvas ==
== Canvas ==
Line 55: Line 53:


== PUI (legacy GUI) ==
== PUI (legacy GUI) ==
For now, the goal is to make an '''optional''' Qt dependency to replace PLIB PUI. Except of course PUI will have to remain for some awkward use cases in the short term (aircraft dialogs, potentially). When compiled without Qt support, you’ll get a fully functional FG (i.e., '''Qt will never be a requirement to build FG'''), but without the GUI functions – which is indeed what some people want anyway (e.g., in some home cockpit setups).
Related to Qt, up to now - only a simple replacement for the Mac Launcher has been introduced. This is not related to the internal user interface of FlightGear, at least for now. If, how and when the internal gui can leverage Qt is under investigation and in such an early state that those responsible preferred to not announce anything yet. If this ever happens, this will be discussed on the mailing list<ref>http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=229563#p229563</ref>
Related to Qt, up to now - only a simple replacement for the Mac Launcher has been introduced. This is not related to the internal user interface of FlightGear, at least for now. If, how and when the internal gui can leverage Qt is under investigation and in such an early state that those responsible preferred to not announce anything yet. If this ever happens, this will be discussed on the mailing list<ref>http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=229563#p229563</ref>


Navigation menu