Talk:Scripted AI Objects: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
your code is looking really good - a few more comments
No edit summary
m (your code is looking really good - a few more comments)
Line 206: Line 206:
I'll try to contribute a little but time, sadly is missing here !
I'll try to contribute a little but time, sadly is missing here !
—[[User:5H1N0B1|5H1N0B1]] ([[User_talk:5H1N0B1|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/5H1N0B1|contribs]]) 22:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
—[[User:5H1N0B1|5H1N0B1]] ([[User_talk:5H1N0B1|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/5H1N0B1|contribs]]) 22:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
* you can probably use forindex/foreach loops in a few places
* using named arguments in calls with many parameters would make sense eventually
* maketimer() should be favored over settimer()
* using isa() for sanity checking is a good thing!
* ideally, the code would be flexible enough so that existing code like tanker.nas can be updated/ported accordingly
* reset/re-init listeners should be registered to deal with sim resets/repositioning
BTW: good job so far ! We can move the code to the main article for collaboratively editing it there...--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 21:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Navigation menu