User talk:Philosopher/Nasal introspection: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 129: Line 129:


::: If you can port your test.nas script to also work with the standalone interpreter in SG (no listeners, timers and systime), you could also just run it in valgrind (leak detector) which would tell you if the interpreter is leaking memory when running your script - use the nasal-shell if you don't have valgrind available locally.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 23:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
::: If you can port your test.nas script to also work with the standalone interpreter in SG (no listeners, timers and systime), you could also just run it in valgrind (leak detector) which would tell you if the interpreter is leaking memory when running your script - use the nasal-shell if you don't have valgrind available locally.--[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 23:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:::: I'll try that, since the issues don't go away when I delete the test namespace it's likely that I introduced a leak in the C side of things (which I still find odd). [[User:Philosopher|—Philosopher]] ([[User talk:Philosopher|talk]]) 00:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


== Debugging Threads ==
== Debugging Threads ==
395

edits

Navigation menu