395
edits
User talk:Philosopher/Nasal introspection: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:Philosopher/Nasal introspection (view source)
Revision as of 20:29, 14 August 2013
, 14 August 2013no edit summary
Philosopher (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
:: Ideally, in a "share-nothing" fashion (if possible), where you'd have a pool of worker threads, that merely receive temporary copies of data (i.e. not to be modified), which isn't referenced otherwise, so easy to mark/reap (recursion depth-wise). This is what "message passing" is all about: reduce the amount of necessary synchronization to an absolute minimum, and otherwise have a pool of "agent" threads that process messages and that only ever communicate with other agents through messages. | :: Ideally, in a "share-nothing" fashion (if possible), where you'd have a pool of worker threads, that merely receive temporary copies of data (i.e. not to be modified), which isn't referenced otherwise, so easy to mark/reap (recursion depth-wise). This is what "message passing" is all about: reduce the amount of necessary synchronization to an absolute minimum, and otherwise have a pool of "agent" threads that process messages and that only ever communicate with other agents through messages. | ||
::: I just pushed another threading approach, it's something in between what you just described and what I had before. I'm still getting huge amounts of GC-findable objects, and I have a feeling that's coming from my script, but where?? The queues should be thrown out sometime, as once the worker thread is done with it it should be garbage, and I can't think of anything else that is more than a "temp". Anyways, it sorta works now, frame latencies of 100-200 when I don't garbage collect, but that happens every other frame so really it is in the thousands and going up :P. [[User:Philosopher|—Philosopher]] ([[User talk:Philosopher|talk]]) 20:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
<hr/> | <hr/> | ||