FlightGear run levels: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 47: Line 47:


In the even longer run, we'd actually want to associate the Nasal scripts with run-levels (/etc/rc.d, anyone?), since the frontend GUI might want a few scripts loaded, while I assume most are only relevant when actually flying. Such a change also makes postinit() unnecessary, I think - since the effect can always be achieved by having init() watch for a higher run-level.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03373.html |title=Subsystem run-levels|author=James Turner |date=17 April 2006 }}</ref>}}
In the even longer run, we'd actually want to associate the Nasal scripts with run-levels (/etc/rc.d, anyone?), since the frontend GUI might want a few scripts loaded, while I assume most are only relevant when actually flying. Such a change also makes postinit() unnecessary, I think - since the effect can always be achieved by having init() watch for a higher run-level.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03373.html |title=Subsystem run-levels|author=James Turner |date=17 April 2006 }}</ref>}}
<references/>


== Objective ==
== Objective ==

Navigation menu