Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 256: Line 256:  
The scenario was based around the idea that pilots should have basic skills in addition to merely flying with an autopilot, and was designed to test both their actual flying ability by not having airports at their destinations, and providing no actual navigational data beyond a map or two. They were required to map their routes in territory unknown to them, then fly those routes in their chosen aircraft, land, report in, then return to CYAV to complete a "cycle." Points were awarded for cycle completion, and points deducted for aircraft crashes. FG Seg faults were not penalized.
 
The scenario was based around the idea that pilots should have basic skills in addition to merely flying with an autopilot, and was designed to test both their actual flying ability by not having airports at their destinations, and providing no actual navigational data beyond a map or two. They were required to map their routes in territory unknown to them, then fly those routes in their chosen aircraft, land, report in, then return to CYAV to complete a "cycle." Points were awarded for cycle completion, and points deducted for aircraft crashes. FG Seg faults were not penalized.
   −
Comments back about the operation from pilots have so far been positive. Watch the [http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=10&sid=381d9860a9183d143cd2fa8aee16099d Multiplayer Forums] for the next one; there will be one, but at this writing, it has not yet been decided.  
+
Comments back about the operation from pilots have so far been positive. Watch the [http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=10&sid=381d9860a9183d143cd2fa8aee16099d Multiplayer Forums] for the next one; there will be one, but at the time of writing, it has not yet been decided.  
    
* [[FlightGear Flying Club]]
 
* [[FlightGear Flying Club]]
371

edits

Navigation menu