20,741
edits
Howto:Processing legacy PUI dialogs using Canvas: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Howto:Processing legacy PUI dialogs using Canvas (view source)
Revision as of 15:17, 9 October 2016
, 9 October 2016→Is this going to be committed ?
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 568: | Line 568: | ||
=== Is this going to be committed ? === | === Is this going to be committed ? === | ||
It depends. In its current form this is a proof-of-concept, and it would definitely need some TLC to be ready for prime time. Equally, getting more people involved would be helpful, but most contributors are hesitant to get involved in something like this due to the Phi/Qt5 efforts, which could quickly make this whole thing obsolete. | It depends. In its current form this is a proof-of-concept, and it would definitely need some TLC to be ready for prime time. Equally, getting more people involved would be helpful, but most contributors are hesitant to get involved in something like this due to the Phi/Qt5 efforts, which could quickly make this whole thing obsolete. | ||
As of mid 2016, the general consensus seems that if it is true that this could help deprecating PUI, probably nobody would object against removing PUI and replace it by CUI, keeping the old syntax. At least for a while. Dropping PUI would be a huge step forward <ref>{{cite web | |||
|url = https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35157325/ | |||
|title = <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] GUI options (Was: Aircraft center) </nowiki> | |||
|author = <nowiki> Torsten Dreyer </nowiki> | |||
|date = Jun 14th, 2016 | |||
|added = Jun 14th, 2016 | |||
|script_version = 0.40 | |||
}}</ref>, i.e. the status is that since there has not been a fundamental objection against this on the mailing list and several people have said they can live with the option as long as it remains an option, ThorstenR offered to commit pui2canvas to FGData in the form of a Nasal module that gets loaded 'on demand' dependent on a set property (similar to AW). | |||
We'll then see whether people find it more widely useful etc. and whether FG more generally relies on it for fixing such bugs/issues or not.<ref>{{cite web | |||
|url = https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=289910#p289910 | |||
|title = <nowiki> Re: canvas vs. on-screen messages - 1:0 </nowiki> | |||
|author = <nowiki> Thorsten </nowiki> | |||
|date = Jul 2nd, 2016 | |||
|added = Jul 2nd, 2016 | |||
|script_version = 0.40 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
{{FGCquote | {{FGCquote | ||