UI Unification: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:


== Motivation ==
== Motivation ==
Our lowest-effort, most-visually pleasing and consistent result is going to be making both Phi and Qt UIs able to work / translate / parse the dialog XML syntax. Likely with some exceptions, especially on the Phi side if Nasal is involved. The question is how practical this really is; i.e. due to the complexity of the aircraft dialogs - a solution which works with the common 90 or 95% would be good enough<ref>{{cite web
Our lowest-effort, most-visually pleasing and consistent result is going to be making both Phi and Qt UIs able to work / translate / parse the existin dialog [[PUI]]/XML syntax.  
 
Likely with some exceptions, especially on the [[Phi]] side if [[Nasal]] is involved.  
The question is how practical this really is; i.e. due to the complexity of the aircraft dialogs - a solution which works with the common 90 or 95% would be good enough<ref>{{cite web
   |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34537052/  
   |url    =  https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/34537052/  
   |title  =  <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] GUI questions (again) </nowiki>  
   |title  =  <nowiki> Re: [Flightgear-devel] GUI questions (again) </nowiki>  

Navigation menu