Talk:Mumble
Protect page request
Given the recent actions of a certain group of users, and given that their preferred method of evangelising is via mumble, I wonder if this page could be protected to edits, and any servers listed here could receive some minimal vetting.
I4dnf (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2016 (EDT)
- Hmm, OK, so you think that Falcon is me? NO! He is one of my friends. Also known as CHT0022. I guess he decided to crosspost my entry? But you do read the JWOCKY forum, good for you! -it0uchpods (talk)
Page protection 04/2016
Just for future reference, should this ever become an issue again:
- https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35037084/
- https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35039130/
- https://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/35037331/
--Hooray (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2016 (EDT)
- https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=29433&p=283488#p283488 --it0uchpods (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2016 (EDT)
Here is another archived reference, in thread view:
Bugman (talk) 09:35, 26 April 2016 (EDT)
Alternative Mumble servers
I have now unlocked the page as the situation has calmed down and I believe that reasonable discussions can be had. it0uchpods, is there a reason you deleted your edits, as seen on the 12:39, 21 March 2016 version of the page? This was quite reasonable, presenting your server as an alternative Mumble server, after the main server. I would suggest, though, having a line saying to follow the instructions as for the normal server, but then present a table with only the differences. Points 1-3 don't need to be repeated as they are identical. For better sectioning, it might also be better to change the section title of the main server to "Mumble servers", and then create two subsections "Main Mumble server" and "Alternative Mumble server".