4,400
edits
Decoupling the AI traffic system: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Decoupling the AI traffic system (view source)
Revision as of 17:34, 2 December 2010
, 2 December 2010Bot: Automated text replacement (-CVS +Git)
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-CVS +Git)) |
|||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
* "I think it would make sense to have the server [or a separate client instance] handle any non-human controlled vehicles. It would keep the load off the client which already has its hands full doing a full systems simulation as well as doing graphics work." [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@flightgear.org/msg18437.html] | * "I think it would make sense to have the server [or a separate client instance] handle any non-human controlled vehicles. It would keep the load off the client which already has its hands full doing a full systems simulation as well as doing graphics work." [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@flightgear.org/msg18437.html] | ||
* "FlightGear is an old code base, and lots of the old assumptions (like a single aircraft) need to be teased out of the code before progress can be made on new features. This kind of work isn't glamorous, and often requires more effort than the new development does. But it's not brain surgery either. The problem with some great new features is that they show up with code that is "ready" to integrate, but without the integration work done. So they languish in the | * "FlightGear is an old code base, and lots of the old assumptions (like a single aircraft) need to be teased out of the code before progress can be made on new features. This kind of work isn't glamorous, and often requires more effort than the new development does. But it's not brain surgery either. The problem with some great new features is that they show up with code that is "ready" to integrate, but without the integration work done. So they languish in the Git tree until everyone forgets about them. " [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@flightgear.org/msg18446.html] | ||