86
edits
AI Traffic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (Image placements in Groundnet flow section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 414: | Line 414: | ||
To achieve this we only have two tools at our disposal: The ability to force the direction of traffic on any given segment (by making it “unidirectional”) and the ability of Traffic manager to handle priorities and queues formation at routes merging points (Y shaped intersections). | To achieve this we only have two tools at our disposal: The ability to force the direction of traffic on any given segment (by making it “unidirectional”) and the ability of Traffic manager to handle priorities and queues formation at routes merging points (Y shaped intersections). | ||
The complexity of Routing Flow will increase exponentially with the number of gates, thresholds and traffic files handled: A single groundnet flow must accommodate indifferently a cargo flight arriving on RWY 1 in the evening or a commuter departing from RWY 2 in the | The complexity of Routing Flow will increase exponentially with the number of gates, thresholds and traffic files handled: A single groundnet flow must accommodate indifferently a cargo flight arriving on RWY 1 in the evening or a commuter departing from RWY 2 in the morning. | ||
A simple example to better understand how efficient routing is achieved can be derived from your experience at an airport Baggage carousel (or at a ‘Sushi Train restaurant)’ where all bags arrive from one or two tunnels onto a moving belt and are distributed to passengers waiting around the carousel. | A simple example to better understand how efficient routing is achieved can be derived from your experience at an airport Baggage carousel (or at a ‘Sushi Train restaurant)’ where all bags arrive from one or two tunnels onto a moving belt and are distributed to passengers waiting around the carousel. | ||