Ca/Sistema de qualificació d'aeronaus: Difference between revisions

Is it right that aircraft are only rated by their respective developers? Many lack a rating, and in many cases the maintainer is absent or just doesn't care. If, as originally, the rating is intended open to everyone, should unrated aircraft be rated by users? It would be reasonable for alpha development versions (they're easy to rate), but could lead to wrong ratings for the more developed ones. Yet this might incentivize their maintainers (hardly a well developed project is not maintained) to fix those, so far, unused ratings. Some insights on this were examined in the forum thread on this topic: see [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193&p=211086#p211086 this forum post].