3,032
edits
Autopilot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
m (im very sorry, smal mistake) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Some aircraft in FlightGear however only provide one means of interacting with the autopilot (i.e. autopilot dialog '''or''' panel hotspots). | Some aircraft in FlightGear however only provide one means of interacting with the autopilot (i.e. autopilot dialog '''or''' panel hotspots). | ||
For example, the [[Piper PA34-200T Seneca II|Seneca II]] and the [[Piper PA-24 Comanche|Piper Comanche]] autopilots can be only used from the virtual cockpit using custom panel hotspots. This is in fact increasingly the case, as new emulations of autopilot systems are implemented using the built-in scripting language [[Nasal scripting language|Nasal]] which provides for much more flexible system design and functionality, compared to the relatively static way of describing autopilot systems and their relevant and modes using only the XML-configurable autopilot system. In fact, to properly emulate more complex autoflight systems that provide support for more abstract flight modes, using a combination of XML-configurable PID controllers and Nasal is likely to be the most promising approach. | For example, the [[Piper PA34-200T Seneca II|Seneca II]] and the [[Piper PA-24 Comanche|Piper Comanche]] autopilots can be only used from the virtual cockpit using custom panel hotspots. This is in fact increasingly the case, as new emulations of autopilot systems are implemented using the built-in scripting language [[Nasal scripting language|Nasal]] which provides for much more flexible system design and functionality, compared to the relatively static way of describing autopilot systems and their relevant and modes using only the [[XML]]-configurable autopilot system. In fact, to properly emulate more complex autoflight systems that provide support for more abstract flight modes, using a combination of XML-configurable PID controllers and Nasal is likely to be the most promising approach. | ||
In general, it can be considered to be more complex to provide proper cockpit panel implementations than wiring up the autopilot properties to the standard autopilot GUI dialog, so if an aircraft's autopilot doesn't seem to work properly using cockpit panel hotspots, you may want to try using the standard GUI dialog instead. | In general, it can be considered to be more complex to provide proper cockpit panel implementations than wiring up the autopilot properties to the standard autopilot GUI dialog, so if an aircraft's autopilot doesn't seem to work properly using cockpit panel hotspots, you may want to try using the standard GUI dialog instead. | ||