573
edits
User talk:Bigstones/Essay:A plan for a reorganization of the wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:Bigstones/Essay:A plan for a reorganization of the wiki (view source)
Revision as of 22:48, 8 May 2014
, 8 May 2014→Approaching CategoryTree: asking a 2nd row of questions
(→Bot proposal (request?): splitting "bots" and "new articles" topics) |
(→Approaching CategoryTree: asking a 2nd row of questions) |
||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
:::: Definitely, thanks. --[[User:Bigstones|Bigstones]] ([[User talk:Bigstones|talk]]) 14:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | :::: Definitely, thanks. --[[User:Bigstones|Bigstones]] ([[User talk:Bigstones|talk]]) 14:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
===2nd row of questions=== | |||
Ok. Now I have another couple questions: | |||
* What's the reasoning behind the distinction between [[:Category:Developer Plans]] and [[:Category:Development projects]]? Does it make sense to tie development plans to a developer? Or is there a difference between plans and projects? (ok, the former are just dreams, but the latter don't guarantee anything.) | |||
* What exactly makes development ''core''? | |||
*#Changing C++ in fg/flightgear Git repo | |||
*#Changing C++ in any fg/ Git repo project | |||
*#Coding in C++ | |||
*#Any coding related activity (i.e. including nasal and python) integrated in fg | |||
*#Like above but also separate tools like osm2city | |||
*#Anything but aircraft/scenery development (excluding also little nasal scripts for animation purpose) | |||
*Is shader development core? is it sorcery? | |||
--[[User:Bigstones|Bigstones]] ([[User talk:Bigstones|talk]]) 22:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Tools for a better "new article" interface == | == Tools for a better "new article" interface == | ||