Ca/Sistema de qualificació d'aeronaus: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
#Si un mantenidor no es pot localitzar o es desconeix que l'avió està abandonat, feu la classificació i sol·liciteu que el canvi es fusioni al paquet base.
#Si un mantenidor no es pot localitzar o es desconeix que l'avió està abandonat, feu la classificació i sol·liciteu que el canvi es fusioni al paquet base.


Vegeu [[#Considerations on the rating procedure|més avall]] per a algunes consideracions sobre aquest procediment de qualificació.
Vegeu [[#Consideracions sobre el procediment de qualificació|més avall]] per a algunes consideracions sobre aquest procediment de qualificació.


== Rating criteria ==
== Criteris de valoració ==
=== Flight Dynamics Model (FDM) ===
=== Flight Dynamics Model (FDM) ===
* 0: None, or using FDM from other aircraft
* 0: None, or using FDM from other aircraft
Line 38: Line 38:
* 5: FDM matches PoH and most known test data.
* 5: FDM matches PoH and most known test data.


=== Systems ===
=== Sistemes ===
* 0: No controllable systems: engine is always on, generic radio,
* 0: No controllable systems: engine is always on, generic radio,
* 1: Generic engine start/stop (}}s), correct size/number of fuel tanks,  generic (untuned) autopilot, working flaps/gear
* 1: Generic engine start/stop (}}s), correct size/number of fuel tanks,  generic (untuned) autopilot, working flaps/gear
Line 50: Line 50:
Furthermore, for a 3 or above, the aircraft should not implement systems not present in the real aircraft (e.g. flaps if none present IRL). The exception to this is an autopilot accessed through the menu (considered useful for flight testing purposes).
Furthermore, for a 3 or above, the aircraft should not implement systems not present in the real aircraft (e.g. flaps if none present IRL). The exception to this is an autopilot accessed through the menu (considered useful for flight testing purposes).


=== Cockpit ===
=== Cabina de pilotatge ===
* 0: No cockpit
* 0: No cockpit
* 1: 2D panel, no cockpit.
* 1: 2D panel, no cockpit.
Line 58: Line 58:
* 5: 3D panel and accurately modelled 3D cockpit with photo-realistic texturing.
* 5: 3D panel and accurately modelled 3D cockpit with photo-realistic texturing.


=== External Model ===
=== Model exterior ===
* 0: None
* 0: None
* 1: Simple 3D model, no animations
* 1: Simple 3D model, no animations
Line 70: Line 70:
(you are free to remove this NOTE after reviewed this proposition)}}
(you are free to remove this NOTE after reviewed this proposition)}}


== Overall status ==
== Estat general ==
Sum the ratings of the 4 criteria, to produce an overall score from 0 to 20.
Sum the ratings of the 4 criteria, to produce an overall score from 0 to 20.


Line 81: Line 81:
* 8 or lower:[[:Category:Aircraft status: Alpha|alpha]]
* 8 or lower:[[:Category:Aircraft status: Alpha|alpha]]


== Encoding the rating ==
== Codificació de la puntuació ==
=== In the -set.xml file ===
=== In the -set.xml file ===
The ratings should be encoded in the -set.xml file for the aircraft, under <sim> as follows.
The ratings should be encoded in the -set.xml file for the aircraft, under <sim> as follows.
Line 95: Line 95:
</syntaxhighlight>
</syntaxhighlight>


=== In aircraft articles on the wiki ===
=== En els articles d'aeronaus al wiki ===
Status ratings can be (optionally) included in an aircraft's wiki article. '''Please note that those posted on the wiki are only used by the wiki itself and do not substitue the rating in -set.xml, as described above!'''
Status ratings can be (optionally) included in an aircraft's wiki article. '''Please note that those posted on the wiki are only used by the wiki itself and do not substitue the rating in -set.xml, as described above!'''


Line 109: Line 109:
You can find the current wiki aircraft pages within each status level via the [[:Category:Aircraft by status|aircraft status category]] page.
You can find the current wiki aircraft pages within each status level via the [[:Category:Aircraft by status|aircraft status category]] page.


== Considerations on the rating procedure ==
== Consideracions sobre el procediment de qualificació ==
Is it right that aircraft are only rated by their respective developers? Many lack a rating, and in many cases the maintainer is absent or just doesn't care. If, as originally, the rating is intended open to everyone, should unrated aircraft be rated by users? It would be reasonable for alpha development versions (they're easy to rate), but could lead to wrong ratings for the more developed ones. Yet this might incentivize their maintainers (hardly a well developed project is not maintained) to fix those, so far, unused ratings. Some insights on this were examined in the forum thread on this topic: see [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193&p=211086#p211086 this forum post].
Is it right that aircraft are only rated by their respective developers? Many lack a rating, and in many cases the maintainer is absent or just doesn't care. If, as originally, the rating is intended open to everyone, should unrated aircraft be rated by users? It would be reasonable for alpha development versions (they're easy to rate), but could lead to wrong ratings for the more developed ones. Yet this might incentivize their maintainers (hardly a well developed project is not maintained) to fix those, so far, unused ratings. Some insights on this were examined in the forum thread on this topic: see [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193&p=211086#p211086 this forum post].


== Related content ==
== Contingut relacionat ==
=== Wiki articles ===
=== Articles wiki ===
* [[Release:Aircraft Selection Criteria]]
* [[Release:Aircraft Selection Criteria]]
* [[Catalog metadata]]
* [[Catalog metadata]]


=== Forum topics ===
=== Temes del Fòrum ===
Some topics on the FlightGear forum related to the background behind the aircraft rating system:
Some topics on the FlightGear forum related to the background behind the aircraft rating system:
* [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193 Aircraft Rating System] (First post dated Thu May 26, 2011)
* [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193 Aircraft Rating System] (First post dated Thu May 26, 2011)
449

edits

Navigation menu