Talk:Sydney International Airport: Difference between revisions

From FlightGear wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (sign your posts properly, it's the cool thing to do! use ~~~~ at the end of all your posts)
Line 1: Line 1:
There's no reason for this page to include a big list of IATA airline codes, and the runway / ILS data would be far more useful as a table than prose.
There's no reason for this page to include a big list of IATA airline codes, and the runway / ILS data would be far more useful as a table than prose.''<small>—This unsigned comment was added by</small>''<small> [[User:Zakalawe |Zakalawe ]] ([[User talk:Zakalawe |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zakalawe |changes]]) 13:37, 13 October 2010  (UTC)</small>




Line 5: Line 5:
As for the airline stuff, yeah I'm not sure of it usefulness, I think I got the idea from one of the other airport pages, but I'll probably remove it as I refine the pages, along with refining what is useful in the runway section, I'm still thinking of how to add RNAV and VOR approaches, and how much STAR/SID information would be useful to summarise.... Since I only have about 1hour each night to work on it, it might take me a little while to refine it.
As for the airline stuff, yeah I'm not sure of it usefulness, I think I got the idea from one of the other airport pages, but I'll probably remove it as I refine the pages, along with refining what is useful in the runway section, I'm still thinking of how to add RNAV and VOR approaches, and how much STAR/SID information would be useful to summarise.... Since I only have about 1hour each night to work on it, it might take me a little while to refine it.


S.
S.''<small>—This unsigned comment was added by</small>''<small> [[User:Scotth1|Scotth1]] ([[User talk:Scotth1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scotth1|changes]]) 08:10, 14 October 2010  (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 02:10, 15 October 2010

There's no reason for this page to include a big list of IATA airline codes, and the runway / ILS data would be far more useful as a table than prose.—This unsigned comment was added by Zakalawe (talkchanges) 13:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


The runway/ils is the format used in other airport pages, so I just copied it. As for the airline stuff, yeah I'm not sure of it usefulness, I think I got the idea from one of the other airport pages, but I'll probably remove it as I refine the pages, along with refining what is useful in the runway section, I'm still thinking of how to add RNAV and VOR approaches, and how much STAR/SID information would be useful to summarise.... Since I only have about 1hour each night to work on it, it might take me a little while to refine it.

S.—This unsigned comment was added by Scotth1 (talkchanges) 08:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)