Talk:Property Tree Intro: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Can I make a suggestion. Split up the pages and have a navigation bar at the top ie Property Tree >> Intro - Tree - [[Property Tree Servers|Serv...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Navigation bar=== | |||
Can I make a suggestion. | Can I make a suggestion. | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
* the [[Property Tree]] would have the server part moves to a different page | * the [[Property Tree]] would have the server part moves to a different page | ||
* The servers page is seperate | * The servers page is seperate | ||
---- | |||
:Hi, | |||
:What excactly would be the benefit of doing so? We do have indexes at the top of each article, which lists all (sub)headings within the article. I would vote for writing more content before thinking about seperate pages. Having three pages with tiny pieces of text doesn't make the wiki easier to read/understand... I hope you can explain your motivation a little further. Maybey we can agree on something ;) | |||
:PS: Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~), so we can see your name/date! | |||
:Regards, [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 03:57, 7 September 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 07:57, 7 September 2009
Can I make a suggestion.
Split up the pages and have a navigation bar at the top ie
Property Tree >> Intro - Tree - Servers
- Where intro would remain largely as is.
- the Property Tree would have the server part moves to a different page
- The servers page is seperate
- Hi,
- What excactly would be the benefit of doing so? We do have indexes at the top of each article, which lists all (sub)headings within the article. I would vote for writing more content before thinking about seperate pages. Having three pages with tiny pieces of text doesn't make the wiki easier to read/understand... I hope you can explain your motivation a little further. Maybey we can agree on something ;)
- PS: Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~), so we can see your name/date!
- Regards, Gijs 03:57, 7 September 2009 (EDT)