Talk:Bindings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Out of date?: new section) |
(→Out of date?: saw your comment) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Hi Hooray, | Hi Hooray, | ||
Could you indicate wich part is out of date? I | Could you indicate wich part is out of date? Not complete is something different than out of date. As far as I'm aware the content of the article is mostly/completely correct. | ||
[[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 15:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC) | [[User:Gijs|Gijs]] 15:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:13, 29 May 2013
How do <command>property-set</command> and <command>property-assign</command> (used in the CDU) differ? --Hcc23 22:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hcc23,
welcome on board :-)
- these (and other) commands are documented in $FG_ROOT/Docs/README.commands (FG_ROOT being the FG base package): http://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/blobs/master/Docs/README.commands
- the C++ code implementing these commands is to be found in $FG_SRC/Main/fg_commands.cxx http://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/blobs/next/src/Main/fg_commands.cxx
- increasingly, such hard-coded commands are being replaced with Nasal (scripting language) code instead
- the details of osgText animations are documented in $FG_ROOT/Docs/README.osgtext: http://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/blobs/master/Docs/README.osgtext
- the lateral keys of a CDU are commonly called "Line Select Keys" (LSK), so this might be a more appropriate abbreviation
- the whole project's source code can be found at http://gitorious.org/fg/ - you can easily clone the whole project to work on your own branches
- the FlightGear developers mailing list and the FlightGear forums are a better place to get more direct feedback
Even if you should not subscribe to the developers mailing list, make sure to still check out the forums - let us know if you have any questions. --Hooray 23:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Out of date?
Hi Hooray,
Could you indicate wich part is out of date? Not complete is something different than out of date. As far as I'm aware the content of the article is mostly/completely correct.
Gijs 15:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)