Talk:Backwards Compatibility Initiative: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (adding postings related to FG issues WRT a lack of backward compability) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20774.html | * http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20774.html | ||
* [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg22763.html "Another thing to bear in mind is that no consideration is given to backwards compatibility in FG development"] | * [http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg22763.html "Another thing to bear in mind is that no consideration is given to backwards compatibility in FG development"] | ||
* http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24114.html | |||
* http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24167.html | |||
Revision as of 20:35, 17 October 2009
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20774.html
- "Another thing to bear in mind is that no consideration is given to backwards compatibility in FG development"
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24114.html
- http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24167.html