6,566
edits
Talk:FGAddon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hooray, your additions are negative! Talk of FGMEMBERS and their demands for justifications of the fgdata split from the FlightGear project, and adding this as a 'defence' of FGAddon, is not relevant to the pre-FGMEMBERS history of FGData+FGAddon.
No edit summary |
(Hooray, your additions are negative! Talk of FGMEMBERS and their demands for justifications of the fgdata split from the FlightGear project, and adding this as a 'defence' of FGAddon, is not relevant to the pre-FGMEMBERS history of FGData+FGAddon.) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 11:55, 28 October 2015 (EDT) | ::: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 11:55, 28 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
== History of the fgdata split == | |||
Hooray, I would prefer not to have the following changes: | |||
* http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=FGAddon&diff=98220&oldid=98157 | |||
* http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=FGAddon&diff=98222&oldid=98221 | |||
* http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=FGAddon&diff=98223&oldid=98222 | |||
Firstly, any mention of FGMEMBERS is irrelevant to FGAddon. Ok, they wish to [https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=29559&start=15#p284835 slaughter] FGAddon, but that has zero business in this article. Secondly a lot of the introduced text is a repetition of what is already there. Look at your text where you are quoting my statements about Gijs, and then look at the next paragraph that says "A first splitting attempt was organised by Gijs de Rooy and announced on October 18, 2011". I didn't mention Cedric, but he is listed in the reference at the bottom of the page. But the quote is an almost perfect doubling up of the text - the quote origin is essentially quoting from here, and that is now coming back. As for Curt's quote, this is justifying why SourceForge was used, in the context of FGMEMBERS attacks. I think my original sentence "Other parts of the FlightGear infrastructure were already hosted by SourceForge, making the move a natural one." is sufficient and a positive outlook on the subject, as it is and should be seen. This history section is about presenting the facts. The excessive justifications demanded from the FlightGear community by FGMEMBERS does not in any way belong in here! All of the facts are from long before [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.games.flightgear.devel/78933/focus=78940 FGMEMBERS came into existence]. | |||
[[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 09:22, 14 May 2016 (EDT) | |||