20,741
edits
Template talk:Project infrastructure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Template talk:Project infrastructure (view source)
Revision as of 00:53, 28 February 2016
, 28 February 2016→Some suggestions
(→Slight variation of the current architecture: Is a change ok for you? :-) Good point about alphabetical ordering of the attributes. I'd rather have a link and a clean url) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
—[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 16:26, 27 February 2016 (EST) | —[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 16:26, 27 February 2016 (EST) | ||
:: just for the record, I do agree with this, but on the other hand, had bugman not taken my original idea, I would still be dabbling with the original idea - so, basically within a few hours, bugman went through several iterations of this, without needing much in terms of feedback, and I am pretty satisfied with it personally. I do get your point though, so I would suggest to document "best practices" - I am not much a wiki guru myself, I really only use a tiny fraction of its markup/features, and I am always glad for your contributions to my templates, because it's not something that I am very good at/interested in - I would rather write php/javascript code than having to memorize wikimedia templates myself. But if there is anything that we/I can do better to lighten your workload (Johan, Red Leader, Gijs), please just document your suggestions somewhere. In terms of the overall idea here, I believe it is the right thing to do, and while it my not address all your concerns, it is certainly better than the existing practice - and had we done this a few years ago, we would not be having certain problems now. So I would politely suggest that "we should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good" here, this isn't core development after all - it's just a wiki, and anything that helps reduce our workload is a good thing, until someone comes up with something better somewhere down the road. All in all, let's also keep [http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=42&p=277816#p277816 this] in mind (which may have no immediate repercussions at all, or which may have unfortunate side effects in a few years/months. So, thanks again bugman for all you have handled so far - it's certainly much better, and much faster, than anything that I could have come up with in this timeframe, and I am very impressed with the quality of your wiki involvement - then again, thanks also to Johan for providing the kind of feedback that bugman asked for - but please let's not overthink this... Talking about the "architecture of a template" is a bit too much for my own taste --[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 19:53, 27 February 2016 (EST) | |||
=== The mode parameter === | === The mode parameter === | ||