Template talk:Project infrastructure: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 93: Line 93:


—[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 16:26, 27 February 2016 (EST)
—[[User:Johan G|Johan G]] ([[User_talk:Johan_G|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Johan_G|contribs]]) 16:26, 27 February 2016 (EST)
: Please feel free to change :)  This all sounds great.  My focus is on recursive transclusion for simply pulling out '''sf''', so we can pragmatically change the behaviour of templates.  I can quickly adapt all usage of this template to match.  For example {{tl|flightgear source}} uses it to completely avoid the SourceForge reference, to then pass it into the now very powerful {{tl|repo link}} template.  The table idea is good as well.  It could replace the examples section by absorbing the examples.  I just have some suggestions:
:* A '''code''' value for the second option (replacing '''abbrev''').  This would return '''sf'''.  This would be used as a simple internal wiki code for programmatically changing template behaviour.
:* Alphabetical ordering of values in the switches, in case this becomes quite big.
:* '''url''' return values of <nowiki>[http://wiki.flightgear.org FlightGear wiki]</nowiki>.
:* '''main-repo''' name as "Main FlightGear infrastructure", as this is a collection of repositories, plus a lot of other FG infrastructure.  Maybe '''main-infrastructure''' would be better for a value, though it is a little long.  What about just '''main'''?
: [[User:Bugman|Bugman]] ([[User talk:Bugman|talk]]) 17:02, 27 February 2016 (EST)

Navigation menu