20,741
edits
FGPythonSys: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Vision
(→Status) |
(→Vision) |
||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
== Vision == | == Vision == | ||
{{FGCquote | |||
|1= I like the idea of being able to use Python directly in FG. As many others, I have a bad intuition concerning the security implications if this were open to general aircraft scripting (even though I would love using Python instead of Nasal for that) | |||
|2= {{cite web | |||
| url = http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?p=275923#p275923 | |||
| title = <nowiki>Re: Announcing FFGo: a new FlightGear launcher</nowiki> | |||
| author = <nowiki>rominet</nowiki> | |||
| date = Feb 12th, 2016 | |||
| added = Feb 12th, 2016 | |||
| script_version = 0.23 | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
{{FGCquote | {{FGCquote | ||
|1= I believe that Python is one of the simplest languages to learn. And it regularly ranked in the top 5 programming languages. Therefore I think this is attractive to include as an option for students, researchers, and others interested in experimenting. This can give them a modular tool to leverage the lowest levels of FlightGear, an angle that Nasal currently does not, and has no intention to provide. And this all comes back to the original point the code was written for! | |1= I believe that Python is one of the simplest languages to learn. And it regularly ranked in the top 5 programming languages. Therefore I think this is attractive to include as an option for students, researchers, and others interested in experimenting. This can give them a modular tool to leverage the lowest levels of FlightGear, an angle that Nasal currently does not, and has no intention to provide. And this all comes back to the original point the code was written for! | ||