20,741
edits
m (→Internals) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
Many of us are wondering why Rembrandt is so slow for us, despite having fairly powerful computers. | Many of us are wondering why Rembrandt is so slow for us, despite having fairly powerful computers. | ||
{{FGCquote | |||
|1= there’s plenty of other people with reasonable hardware who have problems with Rembrandt performance - me for example :) And while that may be related to settings, being a lay Mac user I don’t like solutions which require extensive configuration to give acceptable performance. | |||
|2= {{cite web | |||
| url = http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/31687794/ | |||
| title = <nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rendering strategies</nowiki> | |||
| author = <nowiki>James Turner</nowiki> | |||
| date = Nov 27th, 2013 | |||
| added = Nov 27th, 2013 | |||
| script_version = 0.23 | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
{{FGCquote | |||
|1= with a i3770K and a GTX670, I get some hit from ALS (10-30%) but Rembrandt instantly drops me to 20fps, and < 10fps I use an aircraft I actually want to fly (777 or Citation) and go to any major airport (EGKK, EHAM, EDDM, EDDF, EGLC, VHHH) This is at 2560x1600, but on the 670 I would be highly surprised if I'm fill-rate limited, given that AA is off, and the general suboptimal sie of our primitive batches. Emilian has explained on IRC this might be due to the out-of-the-box / default config for Rembrandt being highly suboptimal, which I didn't yet evaluate, I would be delighted to have it more usable. I'm going to test further over the weekend. | |||
|2= {{cite web | |||
| url = http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/31075172/ | |||
| title = <nowiki>Re: [Flightgear-devel] reminder: entering feature freeze now</nowiki> | |||
| author = <nowiki>James Turner</nowiki> | |||
| date = Jun 20th, 2013 | |||
| added = Jun 20th, 2013 | |||
| script_version = 0.23 | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
== Objective == | == Objective == |