20,741
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
{{DeQuote}} | {{DeQuote}} | ||
[[File:Su15-complexity-osg-stats.jpeg|right|thumb|http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=25961&start=135]] | [[File:Su15-complexity-osg-stats.jpeg|right|thumb|http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=25961&start=135]] | ||
{{Troubleshooting}} | |||
== Motivation == | == Motivation == | ||
We are seeing more and more complex aircraft/features developed by aircraft developers, with non-obvious impact on overall FlightGear performance. Many aircraft developers don't fully understand how to draw correct conclusions from interpreting their findings, i.e. if performance issues are related to the FDM, texturing/3D model complexity or other aspects like systems simulation (e.g. Nasal). | We are seeing more and more complex aircraft/features developed by aircraft developers, with non-obvious impact on overall FlightGear performance. Many aircraft developers don't fully understand how to draw correct conclusions from interpreting their findings, i.e. if performance issues are related to the FDM, texturing/3D model complexity or other aspects like systems simulation (e.g. Nasal). |