20,741
edits
User talk:Red Leader: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→removal of Qt5 entry in PUI article: adding just one pointer for now: http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33245028/
(→removal of Qt5 entry in PUI article: new section) |
m (→removal of Qt5 entry in PUI article: adding just one pointer for now: http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33245028/) |
||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
Referring to: http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=PUI&diff=89246&oldid=89243 | Referring to: http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php?title=PUI&diff=89246&oldid=89243 | ||
Technically, you are right given the current form of the launcher, and its current focus/operating mode. However, it's been stated on the devel list, that this is supposed to evolve into a full Qt5 based GUI. And the [[PUI]] article having been initiated by myself, I am reluctant ''not'' to mention it, because I could easily be considered "biased" given that I prototyped the pui2canvas parser specifically in response to the Qt5 discussion on the forum/devel list. | Technically, you are right given the current form of the launcher, and its current focus/operating mode. However, it's been stated on the devel list, that this is supposed to evolve into a full Qt5 based GUI<ref>http://sourceforge.net/p/flightgear/mailman/message/33245028/</ref>. And the [[PUI]] article having been initiated by myself, I am reluctant ''not'' to mention it, because I could easily be considered "biased" given that I prototyped the pui2canvas parser specifically in response to the Qt5 discussion on the forum/devel list. | ||
Now, given the number of new segfaults that seem to point to the Qt5/FG integration layer, I guess that you may be right and that the Qt5 code in FG may still need some TLC - but it's pretty obvious that this is indeed supposed to be a prototype for implementing/evolving a Qt5-based UI in FG. Anyway, thanks for your other edits (and in fact all your housekeeping work on the wiki!) --[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 08:12, 3 November 2015 (EST) | Now, given the number of new segfaults that seem to point to the Qt5/FG integration layer, I guess that you may be right and that the Qt5 code in FG may still need some TLC - but it's pretty obvious that this is indeed supposed to be a prototype for implementing/evolving a Qt5-based UI in FG. Anyway, thanks for your other edits (and in fact all your housekeeping work on the wiki!) --[[User:Hooray|Hooray]] ([[User talk:Hooray|talk]]) 08:12, 3 November 2015 (EST) | ||
<references/> | |||